KA Cartlidge

News from the worlds of writing, publishing, and related technology.

Nathan Bransford: beware the anti-A.I. stampede (and the false-positive problem)

Bransford's April installment opens with the spectacle of OpenAI winding down Sora and Disney walking away from a billion-dollar partnership, then pivots to Wikipedia's new ban on AI-generated content (with narrow carve-outs), and Sam Spratford's Publishers Weekly piece on how publishing still hasn't settled on norms after Hachette dropped Mia Ballard's Shy Girl over suspected AI use. He names the uncomfortable middle: holding tech companies accountable without turning flawed detectors into public shaming machines.

He links Emma Alpern's New York magazine story on false AI accusations and Jane Friedman's essay on "witch hunts," arguing neurodivergent writers and stylistic oddballs are especially exposed. His closing hunch - that people may eventually care less about provenance than quality - won't comfort everyone, but it's an honest snapshot of how a former agent reads the discourse in spring 2026.

(Shortened and summarised to avoid devaluing the source)
Nathan Bransford